CO129-307 - Governor Sir Blake - 1901 [10-12] — Page 714

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

Jan.

a new incremental scale) on

I do not know that he has

1900. since applied for

an increase of

application

But the seat in an application for promotion by transfer in

23910/00.

A.F.25/1 Putty

Jug25

alin

No.5/2.

sir.

Government House, Hongkong, 17th December, 1901.

Page 708

29 JAN 02

By16

I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your Despatch No. 367 of the 31st October, relative to the salary of Mr. R. H. Craig, Assistant Superintendent of Victoria Gaol.

2. In reply to paragraph 2 of that Despatch, I have the honour to inform you that Mr. Craig's name was intentionally omitted from the Classification therein referred to, as he was the Assistant Head of a Department and therefore did not fall within the scope of the Committee's enquiries.

3. Another officer who was similarly omitted from the scheme was the Superintendent of Accounts, Correspondence and Stores in the Public Works Department. His name was originally included in the Classification Scheme but withdrawn at the desire of the Director of Public Works, who was of opinion that Mr. Wood's duties were such as to preclude him from being considered a subordinate officer for the purposes of the Classification.

I have the honour to be, sir,

Your most obedient

Humble servant,

THE RIGHT HONOURABLE

JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN, M.P.

Governor, &c..

Page 709

Edit History

2026-06-01 03:38:05 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Jan. a new incremental scale) on I do not know that he has 1900. since applied for an increase of application But the seat in an application for promotion by transfer in 23910/00. A.F.25/1 Putty Jug25 alin No.5/2. sir. Government House, Hongkong, 17th December, 1901. Page 708 29 JAN 02 By16 I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your Despatch No. 367 of the 31st October, relative to the salary of Mr. R. H. Craig, Assistant Superintendent of Victoria Gaol. 2. In reply to paragraph 2 of that Despatch, I have the honour to inform you that Mr. Craig's name was intentionally omitted from the Classification therein referred to, as he was the Assistant Head of a Department and therefore did not fall within the scope of the Committee's enquiries. 3. Another officer who was similarly omitted from the scheme was the Superintendent of Accounts, Correspondence and Stores in the Public Works Department. His name was originally included in the Classification Scheme but withdrawn at the desire of the Director of Public Works, who was of opinion that Mr. Wood's duties were such as to preclude him from being considered a subordinate officer for the purposes of the Classification. I have the honour to be, sir, Your most obedient Humble servant, THE RIGHT HONOURABLE JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN, M.P. Governor, &c.. Page 709
Baseline (Original)
Jan. a new incremental scale) on I do not know that he has 1900. suice applid for an increase of application But the seat in an applice for promotion by transfer in 23910/00. A.F.25/1 Putty Jug25 alin No.5/2. sir. Goverment House091 Hongkong, 17th. December, 1901. 29 JAN VZ 708 By16 I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your Despatch No. 367 of the 31st. October, rela- tive to the salary of Mr. R. H. Craig, Assistant Superinten- dent of Victoria Gaol. 2. In reply to paragraph 2 of that Despatch, I have the honour to inform you that Mr. Craig's name was in- tentionally omitted from the Classification therein referred to, as he was the Assistant Head of a Department and there- fore did not fall within the scope of the Committee's enquiri- es. 3. Corres- Another officer who was similarly mitted from the scheme was the Superintendent of Accounts, pondence and Stores in the Public Works Department. His nme was originally included in the Classification Scheme but withdrawn at the desire of the Director of Public Works, who was of opinion that Mr. Wood's duties were such as to preclude him from being considered a subordinate officer for the pur- poses of the Classification. I have the honour to be, sir, Your most obedient Humble servant, THE RIGHT HONOURAKLE JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN, M.P. 20overnor, &c..
2026-06-01 03:38:05 · Baseline
View content

Jan.

a new incremental scale) on

I do not know that he has

1900. suice applid for

an increase of

application

But the seat in an applice for promotion by transfer in

23910/00.

A.F.25/1 Putty

Jug25

alin

No.5/2.

sir.

Goverment House091

Hongkong, 17th. December, 1901.

29 JAN VZ

708

By16

I have the honour to acknowledge the

receipt of your Despatch No. 367 of the 31st. October, rela-

tive to the salary of Mr. R. H. Craig, Assistant Superinten-

dent of Victoria Gaol.

2.

In reply to paragraph 2 of that Despatch, I have the honour to inform you that Mr. Craig's name was in- tentionally omitted from the Classification therein referred to, as he was the Assistant Head of a Department and there- fore did not fall within the scope of the Committee's enquiri-

es.

3.

Corres-

Another officer who was similarly mitted

from the scheme was the Superintendent of Accounts, pondence and Stores in the Public Works Department. His nme was originally included in the Classification Scheme but withdrawn at the desire of the Director of Public Works, who was of opinion that Mr. Wood's duties were such as to preclude him from being considered a subordinate officer for the pur-

poses of the Classification.

I have the honour to be, sir,

Your most obedient

Humble servant,

THE RIGHT HONOURAKLE

JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN, M.P.

20overnor, &c..

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.